Just noticed on the eurovision website they posted all the jury votes (think that's the first time that's happened) and looking through some of the result makes for some remarkable reading. Armenia in particular is pretty scandalous. Unsurprisingly all jury members ranked the Azeri entry last (the Azeri jury also returned this favour) but the Armenian jury also then proceeded to rank what would probably have been viewed as their biggest competitors very lowly, with Austrian, Sweden, Hungary and UK rounding out their bottom five. Really interesting stuff. Here's the link: http://www.eurovision.tv/page/results?event=1893&voter=AM

I just hope we won't have a jury anymore in the future. 5 persons working in the music industry have the power of 50% - that's just absurd. There can be corrupt members as we can see in your example.
And finally, most of the jury members are just deciding by their own personal taste, the same way as most of us are doing by televoting.
So why do we need a jury?

I totally agree. Juries is just an open window for imposing results. Democracy not jurocracy !!!

This is actually quite a valid point. The results of both the Armenian and the Azeri juries are HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS . Both of them ranked the vast majority of the favourites as low as possible, whilst giving the top spots to songs that had no hope whatsoever:

Here's the Armenian jury's top 5 and bottom 5 (with favourites marked in green, and particular no-hopers marked in red):
1: Malta
2: Montenegro
3: Belarus
4: Germany
5: Iceland
-
21: United Kingdom
22: Sweden
23: Hungary
24: Austria
25: Azerbaijan

Likewise, the Azeri jury ranking (with favourites marked in green, and particular no-hopers in red):
1: Russia
2: Belarus
3: Hungary
4: Romania
5: Greece
-
21: Switzerland
22: Germany
23: Sweden
24: Austria
25: Armenia

Now obviously these are merely observations with no proof whatsoever, but to me both of their rankings are hugely questionable, particularly those of Armenia (Azerbaijan have already mastered the art of hiding their Eurovision trickery ofc. ). If they want to shoot each other in the foot then they're more than welcome, but deliberately ranking other favourites as low as possible certainly isn't cricket, and shouldn't be tolerated q.f.

were also corrupt. All 5 jury members in the final had the exact same countries in their top 8. Coincidence? I think not.

The plot thickens . I'm guessing that's why the Georgian jury results were disregarded?

Taken from eurovision.tv: "The voting of Georgia in the 2014 Eurovision Song Contest was based on 100% televoting. In case of technical issues with jury voting, or in case of a breach of rules and/or procedures, the Rules of the Eurovision Song Contest state that 100% televoting shall apply."

Also, the importance of the juries is that some songs that are attractive for the people that watch on tv (*cough* Poland *cough*) don't end too high.

Here are some televote and jury places for Poland from different countries.
It's closer in other countries, but these are the ones where Poland would have points with a televote only and where the televote result is better than the jury one (so a lot):

Austria: Televote 3rd - Jury 24th
Belgium: Televote 4th - Jury 26th
Denmark: Televote 10th - Jury 18th
Macedonia: Televote 3rd - Jury 12th
France: Televote 3rd - Jury 15th
Greece: Televote 5th - Jury 17th
Hungary: Televote 7th - Jury 15th
Iceland: Televote 2nd - Jury 23th
Ireland: Televote 1st - Jury 26th
Latvia: Televote 10th - Jury 24th
Lithuania: Televote 4th - Jury 24th
Malta: Televote 9th - Jury 18th
Norway: Televote 1st - Jury 19th
Spain: Televote 6th - Jury 15th
Sweden: Televote 3rd - Jury 17th
Switzerland: Televote 7th - Jury 18th
Holland: Televote 2nd - Jury 25th
Ukraine: Televote 1st - Jury 8th
United Kingdom: Televote 1st - Jury 25th

That means that Poland would be a lot higher if there was no jury, so juries are essential.

And all those people who moan that the UK is being overrun by Poles can now see they are taking over the world (or Europe at least)

Definitely still think that juries are essential. Without the juries the votes for a lot of countries would be the same every year, due to ex-pat populations. It's just a shame that a lot of the ex-Soviet countries take such a corrupt approach. Same situation with the Russian and Belarusian juries exchanging top marks with each other despite both having very average songs. http://www.eurovision.tv/page/results?event=1893&voter=BY http://www.eurovision.tv/page/results?event=1893&voter=RU